1. Introduction
The core of Money Dysmorphia is this: current spending and pain do not build future assets.
The establishment trusts the future guaranteed by the welfare state. The 2030 generation does not. Youth worldwide are turning away. Yet, discourse on surviving as a sovereign individual is lacking. I diagnose their view of the state and their ultimate choices. This article is a light read on how the 2030 generation perceives democratic welfare states, so you’ll find it quite enjoyable.
Related Articles:
- Money Dysmorphia (Part 1): Working Hard to Stay Broke — The Death of Economic Leverage
- Money Dysmorphia (Part 2): The Collapse of Social Leverage — The Death of Individual Competence
- Money Dysmorphia (Part 3): The Real Reason You Always Feel Poor—Joseph Campbell and the Hero’s Journey Scam
2. The Old Morality: Peasant Diligence
“Sweat does not betray.”
This gospel of peasant diligence is now gaslighting. In a post-leverage era, 2030 labor is not a brick for the future. It is a consumable to patch a failing system. The public says:
“Improve your skills.”
But the meritocracy myth is dead. Power moved to groups that pressure parliament. In a swamp of fixed costs, money loses its substance. Between the productivity obsession of “I need to improve myself” and a reality that never changes, young people drift. Where the meritocracy myth shattered, only resentment toward the state and the instinct to survive alone remain.
3. Resenting the State: Why Only Me?
Global 2030s were born in low growth. The 50-60s enjoyed high growth and a “pro-democracy” moral identity. Conflict arises here. The established generation lectures young people on peasant work ethics, using their own success as the benchmark, demanding that the young endure hardship.
But to younger eyes, these are hypocrites — people who preach peace and justice while quietly obsessing over real estate and financial assets. Take France’s May ’68 and Korea’s 5·18. The leftist generation that led those movements eventually became the establishment. The young swung right. This is the exact opposite of what Marxists predicted — that the old guard would be conservative and the young would be progressive.
Youth ask:
“The state has problems too, so why does restructuring only apply to me?”
(1) Why Democracy Fails to Restructure
Democracy is a sanctuary that cannot fix its failures. Costs are shifted to non-establishment generations. Democracy cannot suppress dissatisfaction by force. It must keep citizens from becoming angry. Thus, cleaning up inefficiency is hard. Restructuring creates victims; victims are voters.
Absolute monarchs were reset by the guillotine. René Girard noted that states unite by executing scapegoats. Modern democracy has no scapegoats. Contradictions accumulate. Costs concentrate on the politically powerless. Democracy is a chronic state of struggle — where everyone claims to be a vague victim and demands compensation from the state. Power changes, but debt and interest groups remain. Left or Right, the options are the same: divert anger, suppress the minority, patch the leaks, and sell sweet promises.
(2) Three Self-Protection Strategies of Democracy
[A] Externalizing the Target: Conspiracy Theories
In a democracy, rage against the system has no political outlet. When the people are the “sovereign,” there is no neck left for the guillotine. To mask this paradox, the system conjures phantoms—grand, abstract enemies like the Deep State, the Illuminati, Russia, or Big Capital.
In the pre-democratic era, enemies had names and faces: a witch or a tyrant. But in a modern society where everyone is supposedly a master, responsibility vanishes into thin air. Structural failures are conveniently reduced to either shadowy conspiracies or personal incompetence.
Democracy doesn’t just tolerate these myths; it feeds them, letting external hostilities soak up the critique that should be aimed at the system itself. This redirection of fury has gutted the heart of democracy: rational discourse. Habermas dreamed of elegant salons where citizens solved problems through reason. Instead, our public square has become a toxic wasteland. Authentic debate is dead, replaced by character assassinations and ideological brawling. While elites and powerful unions wrestle in the mud, those actually fighting for survival are shoved out of the conversation.
Now, a haunting question remains:
“If this is the pinnacle of government, why is my life falling apart?”
The public sphere has lost the power to heal its own wounds. Every conflict ends the same way: a crude headcount or a lawsuit. In this game of numbers, the massive senior bloc remains shielded, while the outnumbered youth are left with nothing but structural resentment. If a democracy can no longer protect its minorities, it is not a living system—it is a corpse waiting for a funeral.
[B] Papering Over the Cracks: The Inflation Trap
“The stock market reaches for the stars, yet the local streets are a graveyard. Why?”
This is the haunting question echoed by the 2030 generation worldwide. The answer is simple: For a domestic economy to truly rebound, it must first be allowed to hit rock bottom. But democracy is terrified of the floor.
True growth demands the cold steel of restructuring—pruning away the unproductive and letting capital flow toward innovation. It requires a lean diet of lower taxes and fewer regulations to invite bold investment. But in the theater of elections, bankruptcy and unemployment are political death sentences.
So, every time a crack appears, the government reaches for the printing press. This freshly minted cash never makes it to the “real” world where efficiency is low; instead, it rushes into the stock market like a tidal wave. Through the scars of 2008 and the pandemic, politicians learned three truths:
- Unemployment is a greater sin than inflation.
- Social riots are more terrifying than a hollowed-out treasury.
- A falling stock index is a bigger crisis than a crumbling real economy.
The silver bullet for everything? Liquidity.
Central banks have mastered the art of flooding the system with cash while keeping interest rates as a mere facade. Governments hide behind fancy jargon like “the pump-priming effect” to stack mountains of sovereign debt, while legislatures bypass the spirit of the law to meddle in the market.
Look at France. It teeters on the edge of insolvency, fueled by bloated welfare and staggering debt. Yet, the word “austerity” is a death wish; the moment welfare is touched, Molotov cocktails fly. Korea is no different. The currency has lost 40% of its value in just five years, yet the brakes have failed. The appetite for welfare only grows hungrier. We even see the state bowing to demands for subsidies based on peasant uprisings from three centuries ago. 🤪 It’s a tragedy of the present: today’s complaints are silenced with tomorrow’s ruin, leaving the youth to foot a bill they never signed for.
[C] Dribbling Sweet Promises — The Welfare State
For the 50s and 60s, the welfare state is a moral achievement won through struggle. The 2030 generation sees it differently. The reason some young people are shifting to the right, demanding the right to opt out of welfare and claiming that ‘liberal autocracy’ is better than populism, is not simply because they are far-right or reactionary. It is because they have realized that the existing democratic and progressive narratives fail to protect their [private property rights]. To them, the welfare state is perceived as a ‘tax thief’ that loots their hard-earned money to provide handouts for those who failed at self-management.
[Welfare State = Theft of Health Sovereignty]
France is the land of wine, yet its youth drink less. Korea is the same. The 2030 generation prioritizes fitness and health. They view those who neglect self-care negatively. This is a byproduct of their productivity obsession. Consequently, they resent a health insurance system where those who contribute less receive more. Being young and healthy, their premiums far exceed the benefits they receive. They recognize this structure—rife with moral hazard—is unsustainable. Anger is inevitable.
German youth protest: “One-third of the federal budget goes to elderly welfare, yet only we are drafted for the military. We’d rather be occupied by Russia.”
[Welfare State = Predatory Intergenerational Plunder]
The National Pension is no longer savings. In a stagnant economy with an aging population, pensions and health insurance are legal systems for intergenerational plunder. Charles Ponzi went to prison for paying old investors with new investors’ money. For the youth, welfare and Ponzi schemes are identical.
Small business owners in their 20s and 30s face harsher conditions. They pay double the pension premiums of employees, and health insurance is levied doubly on their homes and cars.
[Welfare State = Robbery of the Honest Taxpayer]
The taxpayer is not the winner in this system. The winners are those who
- ‘shop’ for welfare while paying little,
- the financiers managing pension funds,
- the medical elite profiting from over-treatment,
- and the bureaucrats and politicians maintaining the status quo.
What happens when these three strategies—externalizing enemies, printing money, and selling welfare—merge? Anger is directed at abstract external enemies. The establishment remains protected. The cost of maintaining the system falls on the youth, while the structure remains a sanctuary.
The 2030 generation feels this: They were born into a democracy and taught it was a moral, superior system. Yet, they are always the targets of restructuring, chased by endless productivity obsession. Hard work yields no wealth and no home. The state imposes heavy taxes to support a majority establishment, stifling individual growth. They have become a cynical generation with zero expectations from the democratic state. What choices do they make?
Perspectives on the State: Moral Romantics vs. Money Dysmorphia Survivors
| Analysis Metric | Democratization Gen (Moral Romantics) | 2030 Gen (Money Dysmorphia Survivors) |
|---|---|---|
| Role of the State | A protector and fair mediator | Alchemists protecting the vested interest cartel |
| Essence of Welfare | Social solidarity and a safety net | Forced extraction of healthy assets |
| National Pension | Reliable savings for old age | A state-led, massive Ponzi scheme |
| Health Insurance | Universal medical welfare | Atonement for those who failed at self-management |
| Monetary Policy | Economic stimulus via interest rates | Infinite liquidity injection (Money Printing) |
| Social Conflict | Solutions through rational public discourse | Displacement of rage via conspiracies and hate |
| Restructuring | Viewed as human rights violation/murder | “Why am I the only one stuck in gig work?” |
| Beneficiaries | The poor and marginalized citizens | Bureaucrats, Politicians, Medical Elites, Fund Managers |
| Perceived Reality | “Democracy is great and protects us” | “We are the system’s batteries; survival is solo” |
4. Choice 1: The 100 or 0 Strategy
(1) The Gig Economy
For Korea’s 2030 generation, the path to regular employment in major corporations is blocked. They know that entering an SME often means lifelong stagnation due to labor market rigidity. They are young. They have nothing to lose. So, they embrace 100 or 0 to reverse their fortunes. To them, the state is what Frédéric Bastiat described:
“The state breaks your legs, hands you crutches, and asks you to praise it as a savior.”
They rely neither on the state nor on banks. They survive on their own. They work deliveries or part-time jobs while simultaneously entering the meme coin and Nasdaq futures markets. They run automated video factories despite YouTube’s restrictions. They work as freelancers, ‘sampling’ companies through platforms.
Corporations prefer this. No benefits, no severance, and the workers provide their own tools. This irregular sale of time is the Gig Economy. The 5060 generation worries they are following the path of Japan’s ‘Freeters.’ They fear that exhausting youth in simple labor leaves nothing for old age. The state is also uneasy; a collapsing middle class destabilizes tax revenue and consumption.
I disagree. As long as they remain healthy, this is not as bad as feared. It may be socially undesirable, but it is a rational survival strategy. Surviving in the wild at a young age is the only way to reject exploitation by the establishment. By the time they reach old age, pensions will likely be gone anyway. To become someone who is not bound by a single nation and can choose where to live, we must internalize a wealth of experience and skills. Unlike material assets, these cannot be seized for taxes or welfare; they are investments made entirely for ourself. Then, when the time is right, we can make a full exit with 100% of embodied assets, tax-free.
Here’s a story that actually happened in Lineage M, a game I used to play. There was a guy who delivered food by day and ground game items to sell on the side. He also leveled up other players’ characters for cash. He got good enough that a major in-game operation brought him on — and eventually, he was managing the boss’s own character. he is based in Southeast Asia now, serving as an operations manager for an online gaming studio that specializes in in-game asset farming and boosting services. I think this kind of experience at a young age is invaluable. Building diverse skills and turning hidden connections into assets — that’s something you can only do when you’re young enough to have nothing to lose.
(2) Altcoin Futures Trading
The core of Money Dysmorphia: earning money but feeling penniless because economic and social leverage has collapsed. Money is consumed by the act of breathing rather than accumulating as future assets. Leverage is only justified when there is certainty that fixed costs—education, investment—convert into future assets.
That certainty is gone. Thus, many in the 2030 generation enter the altcoin futures market. They prefer a 3x or 10x leverage on 10 million won over earning pittance. Initially, I viewed this as gambling or dopamine addiction. I felt morally superior for not trading futures. Reality is not that simple.
They have no jobs or credit to lose. Even if assets hit zero, they can return to the gig economy or apply for personal rehabilitation. Taking a shot is not a bad choice. In a society that kicks away the ladder and protects the establishment, there is no way to clear the barrier except through a leverage springboard.
Inflation and democracy have dissolved the leverage in society. Recognizing this makes them desperate. They lack the time to patiently convert debt and cost into assets. Their time preference is high. So they dive into altcoin futures. Personally, I do not trade coin futures. I believe holding Bitcoin spot assets to bet on time leverage is a superior strategy. I will address this later.
Understand this: the rational choices of the 2030 generation manifest as the Gig Economy and altcoin futures trading. They focus on securing economic and social mobility while internalizing and preserving their skills and assets. Since these are tax-exempt and immune to inflation, they offer high reinvestment efficiency. They are essentially cherry-picking the benefits of the welfare state—such as the minimum wage and social insurance—while planning their exit. It’s a clever strategy, but the downside is their high time preference, which prevents them from utilizing time-leverage strategies with a long-term vision.
5. Choice 2: The Gray Zone Strategy
(1) Mediocrity in Everything
The traditional middle-class model viewed high fixed costs—healthcare, education, housing—as leverage. It believed the future was predictable, investment was faithful, and the state kept its promises. They supported the elderly and poured money into their children’s futures like venture capital. With the collapse of leverage, this has become a high-risk, low-reward strategy.
Consequently, the 2030 generation pursues a Gray Zone strategy. Examples include China’s Tangping, Korea’s N-po, and Japan’s Satori generations. They reject the consumption treadmill of marriage, homes, and cars.
In reality:
- They cohabit instead of marrying.
- They marry but have no children.
- They work as employees but focus on online side hustles.
- They avoid friends but socialize on Discord with gaming groups.
- They travel abroad but practice extreme frugality daily.
- They believe in crypto but invest less than $1,000.
The characteristic? Everything is halfway. They fear risk due to an uncertain future, yet they are unwilling to dive in and create an independent survival environment. They are anxious but not dying. They are not actively alive. They are frogs boiling in lukewarm water.
The problem with this strategy is that no archive is built. They breathe, but nothing remains.
- A successful middle-class strategy yields wealth and status; even if it fails, children and meaning remain.
- The 100 or 0 strategy yields a fortune if successful; even if it fails, content, skill, and networks remain.
- The Gray Zone is different: No risk, no meaning. They spend cash on experiences, but those experiences evaporate. They do not convert into children, creative assets, or networks. Travel, dating, and gaming are mere consumption. Stocks and crypto are held in amounts too small to yield explosive returns.
As they reach middle age, terror arrives: “What have I done?” This is a root cause of depression for those who declared themselves childfree or ‘YOLO.’ They have money but no purpose, and they haven’t saved as much as they thought. Nothing was built.
(2) The Gray Zone Generation Watches YouTube
YouTube is their primary way to pass time. The sentiment of despair toward the state is shared across the generation. However, gambling everything or leaving the country is difficult. So they watch YouTube. YouTube serves two functions:
[Anesthesia]
To forget a harsh reality, they need content that diverts attention—shorts, animals, variety shows, or vicarious vlogs. Pain is forgotten momentarily, only to return heavier when the video ends. Their thumbs never stop.
[Hacking Reality]
They wander, seeking a ‘red pill’ to wake up from the state-designed Matrix. They want to escape but lack courage or methods. They cannot earn as much as they want. So, like voyeurs, they watch how others live. They watch those who create new meaning with little. They sit in a cave, drinking a ‘magic potion’ and waiting for the day they will become heroes. But since they feel that day is out of reach, they have given up entirely. As discussed in the previous article, such a day will never come. Reality, swept away by the river of time, will eventually be swallowed by the ocean.
5. Conclusion
The 2030 generation has no illusions about moral superiority or a bright future under democracy. The leverage for a normal reversal is gone. Welfare is taken by the preceding generation; restructuring is always their burden. So, they either flip the board with 100 or 0 or endure in the lukewarm Gray Zone.
Both are understandable choices. Both carry risks. One leads to personal rehabilitation after a futures liquidation; the other leads to forced entrepreneurship in middle age, facing the bitterness of the world for the first time. Is there another way to regain individual sovereignty? Survival by your own rules, outside the state’s game board.
I will address this in the next series.
If you enjoyed this article, you can support the project – thank you!